Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:03:34 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ubldr vs ubldr.bin? Message-ID: <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1@kientzle.com> References: <op.x1tfyc2ckndu52@53555a16.cm-6-6b.dynamic.ziggo.nl> <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org> <D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1@kientzle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:15 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > ubldr.bin is a raw executable image > > (no elf headers) which is self-relocating and can be loaded at any > > address. … a common armv6[hf] userland that runs > > on any board. Previously the single userland difference between various > > arm boards is that UBLDR_LOADADDR was different for each board. > > Wonderful! Nice work. > > > > … and ubldr is still > > being built only for compatibility with people that have older u-boot > > installed. > > Hmmm…. I wonder how Crochet should handle this. Plenty of folks use Crochet to build 10-STABLE and 10.1 images, so we have to be a little careful about jumping ahead with new features that are only available in 11-CURRENT. > > Any plans to MFC this? > > Tim It has all been MFC'd to 10-stable around the end of May and will be in 10.2. The only missing piece is changes to the u-boot ports. I got started on that, got like just wandboard done (but not comitted, I'm not actually a ports committer so I have to get someone's approval to commit), then this crazy-deadline project came up at work. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1437019414.1334.355.camel>