Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:35:07 +0900 From: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL's plus patches Message-ID: <14388.43339.834504.26482Z@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:03:40 -0500 (EST)" <199911190103.UAA54629@misha.cisco.com> References: <199911190103.UAA54629@misha.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, all. > Are those being considered to be included into the TCL port(s)? > Yours, I think tcl ports *must* include plus patch! - Plus patch has upper compatibility to original one. so other tcl depended ports will get no damages. - Plus patch incudes many bug fixes. so we got more stable tcl environments. - Plus patch contains many enhancements, such as more usefull i18n features, so it is good for many asian peoples as well as C locale peoples. I've already made a patch file. Shall I post it? Or should I make "tcl plus" ports? - Taguchi, Takeshi. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14388.43339.834504.26482Z>