Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com> To: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: "Adam D. Marks" <amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? Message-ID: <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com> In-Reply-To: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> References: <Pine.GHP.4.05.10002211329150.28778-100000@polio.ecst.csuchico.edu> <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> writes: DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote: >> >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for >> different network interfaces. DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each interface? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14513.47681.137038.821262>