Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:20:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: size problems with INVARIANTS/DIAGNOSTIC -current kernels Message-ID: <14819.31072.8716.976218@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010100942470.94692-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> References: <14818.16720.20802.44583@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010100942470.94692-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson writes:
> I'm sorry, I think I meant *vtopte(kmemusage). I need to look at the pte
> itself to see if its sane.
I'm being extra dense too.
Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
kmem_init: kmemusage = 0xfffffe0000296000
vtopte (kmemusage) = 0xffffffff80000a58
*(vtopte (kmemusage)) = 0x54b0003111f
halted CPU 0
But -- why should the pte be sane yet? This is before the fault,
which I thought should be the one to make it sane..
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14819.31072.8716.976218>