Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:06:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Chris Casey <chriss@phys.ksu.edu> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ccc Message-ID: <15135.39047.896866.870844@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1010606210051.537H-100000@schottky.phys.ksu.edu> References: <20010606114751.A77329@hub.freebsd.org> <Pine.SOL.3.96L.1010606210051.537H-100000@schottky.phys.ksu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Casey writes: > test@polaris:~> fort -extend_source -arch ev6 -L /compat/linux/usr/lib > -lcxml -o CN1D_2 CrankNicholson.1D.f > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: warning: libc.so.6.1, needed by > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libUfor.so, not found (try using -rpath or > -rpath-link) > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libfor.so: undefined reference to `getenv@GLIBC_2.0' > /compat/linux/usr/lib/libUfor.so: undefined reference to > `strcpy@GLIBC_2.0' This looks like it could be nasty. Where does libUfor.* and libfor.* come from? Compaq, or are they open source? Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15135.39047.896866.870844>