Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:37:45 -0700 From: Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org> To: "hps" <hps@selasky.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=22Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a=22?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>, "Oded Shanoon" <odeds@mellanox.com>, "Meny Yossefi" <menyy@mellanox.com>, "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enabling OFED by default. Message-ID: <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <fc2630f9-dd10-5640-2ce2-a4a3feb6962a@selasky.org> References: <20160211205358.GA3567@brick.home> <56D811B3.6090406@selasky.org> <20160305155620.GB2512@brick.home> <56DC00EA.7050900@selasky.org> <20160523102055.GA2891@brick> <fc2630f9-dd10-5640-2ce2-a4a3feb6962a@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, this got sorted in to spam. Do not enable in tree linuxkpi by default. It will definitely interfere wit= h out of tree graphics work, which would harm far far more users than it be= nefits. If anything GENERIC needs to be getting smaller. Please do not do this. It = is an all around bad idea. -M ---- On Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:10 -0700 Hans Petter Selasky<hps@selasky.or= g> wrote ---- > On 05/23/16 12:20, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a wrote:=20 > > On 0306T1105, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:=20 > >> On 03/05/16 16:56, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a wrote:=20 > >>> On 0303T1128, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:=20 > >>>> On 02/11/16 21:53, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a wrote:=20 > >>>>> Hi. I have a question related to the iSER integration I'm working= on.=20 > >>>>> It would be nice if it was working out of the box, which requires = building=20 > >>>>> with OFED by default. Do you have any thoughts about it? Thanks!= =20 > >>>>>=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> Hi,=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> One issue which must be fixed in the coming ibcore update is this:= =20 > >>>>=20 > >>>>> linking kernel=20 > >>>>> addr.o: In function `addr_resolve':=20 > >>>>> /usr/img/freebsd/sys/ofed/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c:(.text+0x= ec0): undefined reference to `toe_l2_resolve'=20 > >>>>=20 > >>>> The function toe_l2_resolve() is currently only built into a module= , and=20 > >>>> we need to make it available into the kernel aswell.=20 > >>>=20 > >>> Hm, OK. Do you have any ETA for that?=20 > >>>=20 > >>>> BTW: Did you get any more answers on this topic?=20 > >>>=20 > >>> No, not yet. Perhaps I should ask on arch@ then?=20 > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >> We currently working on a OFED upgrade, so it should be after that.= =20 > >>=20 > >> We're trying to land it before 11.0 is out.=20 > >=20 > > Hi. What it looks like?=20 > >=20 > =20 > Hi,=20 > =20 > The OFED 3.2 upgrade won't be part of 11.0.=20 > =20 > Regarding OFED 3.2 by default in the kernel, it might cause some trouble= =20 > for the DRM2 work done by Matthew Macy, CC'ed.=20 > =20 > Matthew, what do you think if the LINUXKPI is in the kernel by default?= =20 > =20 > --HPS=20 > =20 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222>