Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:32:22 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sharing files within a cluster Message-ID: <15863.51974.947725.247198@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021211144337.W83455-100000@fubar.adept.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212111542580.11062-100000@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov> <20021211144337.W83455-100000@fubar.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Hoskins writes: > need robust threading), I would keep the name as generic as possible. > Just a difference of opinion, I suppose... But then if some Linux folks > wanted to adopt it, they wouldn't be stuck with FreeBSDfoo. Is that > really such a shocking ideology? If it a large chunk of it was the FreeBSD kernel, you might indeed want to name it FreeBSDfoo. I'm a BSD biggot too, and I think that the linuxbios name is accurate and descriptive. Can we move on, please? How about porting lustre? Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15863.51974.947725.247198>