Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:45:45 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1044373547.1ce154@mired.org> To: Ruben de Groot <fbsd-q@bzerk.org> Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Darren Pilgrim <dmp@pantherdragon.org>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why no /dev/one? Message-ID: <15929.18601.542905.366283@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20030130151339.GA17486@ei.bzerk.org> References: <3E390FF3.5020706@pantherdragon.org> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0301301150270.17135-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> <20030130151339.GA17486@ei.bzerk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <20030130151339.GA17486@ei.bzerk.org>, Ruben de Groot <fbsd-q@bzerk.org> typed: > And while you're at it, what about /dev/yes and /dev/no to automate > interactive scripts. Or, if you like the challenge, a /dev/fibonacci > and a /dev/pi would be very welcome :) Yes, but is /dev/pi a suitable substite for /dev/random if you seek far enough into it? <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15929.18601.542905.366283>