Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 16:03:10 -0500 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER Branch [was: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc] Message-ID: <15E05F3F-0FC5-490E-8987-6FE735640301@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <20050507201142.GA9298@gothmog.gr> References: <20050502201921.4F0387306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <F89B71C9-2863-498F-BE9F-D41DFB8A070F@bis.midco.net> <20050507192448.GA1401@gothmog.gr> <200505072153.54369.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> <20050507201142.GA9298@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 7, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-05-07 21:53, Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> > wrote: >>> As far as a branch is concerned, please *NO*! Anyone who wishes to >>> maintain a separate IP Filter spinoff of CURRENT can do it using >>> his own disk space and CVS repository (or Perforce branch, if you >>> prefer). >>> >> >> But I think that this kind of pull-ups really needs of some HEAD-UPs >> and the assistance of people more closer to current, before the >> breakage. >> > > That is not strictly necessary, as long as a full "make universe" > is run > before any widespread changes that may break one or more arches. > > >> At last, I can't see this kind of matters in NetBSD, where the >> pullups are done by 'NetBSD people'. >> > > Darren is one of the "FreeBSD people". > You're right, Darren's work isn't insignificant. I didn't intend to discredit him, I was suggesting that the space for an IP Filter tinderbox be created, or for people to stop complaining when he breaks the build, because anyone running FreeBSD-CURRENT for a few years already knows he will. That is all. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15E05F3F-0FC5-490E-8987-6FE735640301>