Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:26:39 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Olivier Vautrin <ovautrin@chez.com> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0 and diablo-jdk-1.3.1 crash Message-ID: <16479.26655.720587.641745@emerger.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <001401c4104a$7488c040$0b00000a@olivier> References: <16479.746.177628.767075@emerger.yogotech.com> <ALPHA3HvoFOAmEaJswF00015f77@alpha.jnpr.net> <16479.12788.232120.392455@emerger.yogotech.com> <001401c4104a$7488c040$0b00000a@olivier>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It is a Pentium 133 Mhz with 32MB RAM. I would think this would work, but who knows. > I tried with another JDK: the JDK-1.4.2 (not the diablo-jdk). I doesn't work > but I have an other kind of error. The java start for 10-20 seconds and then > crash with the following log: Which JDK1.4? The linux or native JVM? I had problems with the linux version, but the native one works great for me on the box where the others don't. (And yes, I just went through this on a couple of boxes, so I've standardized on my home-compiled native JDK1.4 version on both boxes). > Which JDK is supposed to be the more stable? JDK1.3.1 is supposed to be stable, and it is on my P4 box. However, I've personally found the 1.4 JVM to be more stable/usable on all my machines, so am slowing moving everything to using it. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16479.26655.720587.641745>