Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:59:47 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades Message-ID: <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <20040608144433.D31793@unsane.co.uk> <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Risdon writes: > I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees > many commits that are likely to be problematic. In general, no. On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some absolutely critical deadline. I have learned from bitter experience that guaranteed updates, aren't. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16581.57971.324955.793717>