Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:34:12 +0300
From:      Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, cse.cem@gmail.com,  Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What is wrong with dtrace's stack()?
Message-ID:  <168122586.20181024003412@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CAFMmRNz35Ay82NcMnUkSAvpyU5p2m9ykiji1xXcbEanH9A2H%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <170994671.20181021201021@serebryakov.spb.ru>  <CAG6CVpVCe-8OVU%2BKEyAh8swFSAjRshNcNLN0tjAS3W8bZxyrTA@mail.gmail.com> <475670271.20181022003734@serebryakov.spb.ru> <CAOtMX2goztCYJXM72WNR711DEBEKAGk1zFHF=NpE4UiVAF2bAQ@mail.gmail.com> <234d745d-37a9-9610-15b9-0f5cd5af21bf@FreeBSD.org> <b30f2080-1037-1752-60fb-6d22e28ce90d@FreeBSD.org> <CAFMmRNz35Ay82NcMnUkSAvpyU5p2m9ykiji1xXcbEanH9A2H%2Bw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Ryan,

Monday, October 22, 2018, 11:50:29 PM, you wrote:

> Adding -fno-optimize-sibling-calls to the compiler flags will eliminate the TCO.
 Stacks are better but still strange. For example I have such stack (which I
 like better than previous):

 kernel`lock_delay+0x72
 kernel`sosend_generic+0x112c
 kernel`sosend+0x79
 kernel`soo_write+0x6b
 kernel`fo_write+0x4a
 kernel`dofilewrite+0xcd
 kernel`kern_writev+0x79
 kernel`sys_write+0x8f
 kernel`syscallenter+0x774
 kernel`amd64_syscall+0x1b
 kernel`0xffffffff80cebf6d

According to addr2line `sosend_generic+0x112c' is

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c?revision=339419&view=markup#l1579

 Which is call to protocol-specific send function. Where is this function
(it should be tcp for sure)?!

-- 
Best regards,
 Lev                            mailto:lev@FreeBSD.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?168122586.20181024003412>