Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:12:53 -0800 From: George Hartzell <hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Building new Athlon AMD64 Socket 939 or 940 machine Message-ID: <17292.64661.162502.12034@satchel.alerce.com> In-Reply-To: <20051129120243.B64864@cons.org> References: <61FBEC57-424E-450F-A775-10E1F5E8DF92@cian.ws> <20051127215510.A17131@cons.org> <1133190443.41553.18.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <438B1F90.3090708@FreeBSD.org> <1133196263.41553.54.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20051128130516.A36114@cons.org> <1133271434.46168.9.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20051129120243.B64864@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Cracauer writes: > [...] > Just to make that clear: the controller works well (well, no NCQ) > [...] I'm interested in the Shuttle barebones system that folks were discussing a week or so ago. It uses the Nvidia4 chipset. Googling around about the nvidia controller seems to say that the device supports NCQ. Is the lack of NCQ support that you're reporting simply a matter of a feature that's not yet implemented or is there a more fundamental problem? Thanks, g.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17292.64661.162502.12034>