Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:24:17 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keeping track of automatically installed dependency-only ports Message-ID: <18034.34033.990817.311640@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20070615121125.GH1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20070614070602.GD39533@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200706140714.l5E7EK0U023767@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <20070614075418.GA8093@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200706142322.l5ENMbZt009741@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> <20070615121125.GH1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Jeremy writes: > >At the first place, I think such a situation occurs extremly rare. > > For an opposing PoV: I often see ports that looks interesting or > look like a possible solution to a problem and will install the > port to have a play. If it turns out that it's not suitable, I > would like to be able to easily unistall the port and any > dependencies it pulled in that I didn't already have. Oooooh, pretty - me want! Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18034.34033.990817.311640>