Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 09:57:00 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr, FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Idea for next portupgrade Message-ID: <18540.55980.938489.721330@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <486CD2E8.50505@FreeBSD.org> References: <20080702232551.GA3204@pcjas.obspm.fr> <486CD2E8.50505@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergey Matveychuk writes: > > If portupgrade can calculate the depency and launch many ports > > build in same time for non-depending ports it's can be > > wonderful. > > I'm sure it's a good idea. I'd use it too. But I have a very > little free time with my current employment. So I can't implement > it. Sorry. It is also my understanding that ruby (used to manage the ports database) a) is not re-entrant and/or b) does not lock the files it is using/changing. Having two instances running at once causes Bad Things(tm) to happen. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18540.55980.938489.721330>