Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:45:24 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: "Glen Barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Cc: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: imagemagick convert: japanese text broken in freebsd Message-ID: <18757.53972.437289.439136@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310812141940j2a8477fai3101c9bd9f33591d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20997257.post@talk.nabble.com> <20081214100115.U48394@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081214201727.393cbcdf@anthesphoria.net> <20081214231727.V50235@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <87skoqfhkg.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081215022246.B50734@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4ad871310812141736x3d5b10ao55658acff55a58d1@mail.gmail.com> <21007145.post@talk.nabble.com> <87d4fu18ih.fsf@kobe.laptop> <18757.53108.118667.585355@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4ad871310812141940j2a8477fai3101c9bd9f33591d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glen Barber writes: > > Umm ... while one can ask those questions here (questions@) and > > hore to get answered, I believe the sanctioned forum is ports@. > > It's rather lower traffic, which is not a bad thing. > > I agree that they probably *should* be asked on ports@, but > because it is lower traffic, there is a lesser chance of getting > a solution to a problem. Not necessarily. I've heard of knowledgable poeple who are on ports@ but not questions@. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18757.53972.437289.439136>