Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 20:30:10 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@FreeBSD.org> To: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: After following the advise from UPDATING about pythoin-3.11, 'pkg add' now says: pkg: "Cannot solve problem using SAT solver" and attempts to install and then offers to remove py39- packages Message-ID: <187dec33-ae28-435b-9dce-04968da0a45d@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <SI2PR01MB50369A901B50909246BC3AADFAC42@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> References: <b9d28cb8-4071-4d16-9e5b-54b833fe65e8@FreeBSD.org> <SI2PR01MB50369A901B50909246BC3AADFAC42@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------U7fiEDLlMl382xu51vb0Vk2n
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello,
On 6/8/24 14:24, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> I feel that there is a slight possibility that this upgrade may
> include the following issues. ( echo py39-foo ; echo py311-foo ) | sort
You are right. Package DB contains both py39- and py311- packages:
$ pkg search py311- | wc
4477 33240 346412
$ pkg search py39- | wc
3506 25946 270059
Since pkg has no awareness of the current python version - it attempts
to install all found candidates for each particular PKGORIGIN.
Anybody knows what caused this regression in the package database?
Thanks,
Yuri
--------------U7fiEDLlMl382xu51vb0Vk2n
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="monospace">Hello,</font></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="monospace"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="monospace"><br>
</font></div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="monospace">On 6/8/24 14:24,
Tatsuki Makino wrote:<br>
</font></div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:SI2PR01MB50369A901B50909246BC3AADFAC42@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com">I
feel that there is a slight possibility that this upgrade may
include the following issues.
( echo py39-foo ; echo py311-foo ) | sort</blockquote>
<font face="monospace"><br>
</font><br>
<font face="monospace">You are right. Package DB contains both py39-
and py311- packages:</font><br>
<font face="monospace"><span
style="color:#000000;background-color:#ffffff;">$ pkg search
py311- | wc
</span><br>
4477 33240 346412
<br>
$ pkg search py39- | wc
<br>
3506 25946 270059<br>
</font>
<font face="monospace"><br>
Since pkg has no awareness of the current python version - it
attempts to install all found candidates for each particular
PKGORIGIN.</font><br>
<font face="monospace"><br>
</font><br>
<font face="monospace">Anybody knows what caused this regression in
the package database?</font><br>
<font face="monospace"><br>
</font><br>
<font face="monospace">Thanks,</font><br>
<font face="monospace">Yuri<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>
--------------U7fiEDLlMl382xu51vb0Vk2n--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?187dec33-ae28-435b-9dce-04968da0a45d>