Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:38:54 -0600 From: John Hein <jhein@timing.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: ed@80386.nl, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev Message-ID: <18875.60334.947446.966085@gromit.timing.com> In-Reply-To: <20090313.090038.-890725739.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090310.210746.1649765883.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090313125115.GU31961@hoeg.nl> <20090313.090038.-890725739.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote at 09:00 -0600 on Mar 13, 2009: > In message: <20090313125115.GU31961@hoeg.nl> > Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes: > : Hi Warner, > : > : The last couple of days/weeks I've been working a lot with LLVM+Clang. > : I'm currently writing some BSD makefiles to see how hard it is to add > : Clang to our base system, as a proof of concept. > : > : A nice thing about Clang is that it seems to be very easy to compile in > : multiple backends into the same Clang binary. If we ever switch to Clang > : in the base system (who knows), it would be interesting to see whether > : it's useful to just compile in all backends by default. > : > : Anyway, I took a quick look at the xdev patch and it looks okay. :-) > > Woot! Please let me know if it causes problems. I meant to mention this earlier - OSREL (referenced in the _xi-links: target) is not defined. So ports looking for arm-freebsd8.0-cc (for instance) won't find it. An earlier patch of yours had: .if !defined(OSREL) OSREL!= uname -r | sed -e 's/[-(].*//' .endif But the latest (and the one committed) does not.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18875.60334.947446.966085>