Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:27:02 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Message-ID: <19788.10454.458608.393001@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmBDAbAoYNpaqcLkUFchfQ2m_T54S4=YzGXcgy@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinCUuWET3dFVzpTRPfAiqG7hfdPJrAxY=OWVxff@mail.gmail.com> <20110202121446.6f6a10cd@locust.local> <AANLkTikuZ0b0hObp6DoL0ojDp0cu8BtpJZhetf134s-Q@mail.gmail.com> <201102032231.54557.makc@issp.ac.ru> <20110203195602.GD2163@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <19787.4049.939639.870683@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <AANLkTinmBDAbAoYNpaqcLkUFchfQ2m_T54S4=YzGXcgy@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Olivier Smedts writes: > >> =A0Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap = yet? > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 ye= sterday. > > Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0After minimal testing, it appears to behave correct= ly. > =20 > Just installed from ports. I had to mark it MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE on > my 8-core CPU because it failed randomly at different stages. I > also removed the configure line with number of CPUs from the > Makefile. Now it's OK, but with only one CPU to compile it, I did > not find building "quicker than OO" :) =09I have a 4-core AMD, with neither variable set. Once it got through with all the new dependencies, it just ran .... =09Beats me. =09=09=09=09Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19788.10454.458608.393001>