Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 06:01:16 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> To: rminnich@mini.sarnoff.com (Ron Minnich) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: enet throughput Message-ID: <199502100401.GAA16155@dolphin.mikom.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.91.950209202234.26156A-100000@mini.sarnoff.com> from "Ron Minnich" at Feb 9, 95 08:24:54 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think the Ethernet performance also depend on the type of card, I use mostly SMC Elite Ultra cards and I get ~1088kbytes/second on 66MHz 486s. That is using FreeBSD 1.1.5 or 2.X and the ttcp test program. I have a notebook, (33 MHz 486, FBSD 2.0) that use a 3C509 and the performance is bad. John Hay -- jhay@mikom.csir.co.za > > freebsd enet performance doesn't look too good down here. > from freebsd -> irix i see 700 kbytes/sec. This is using 3c509s, isa bus, > p90 systems, the 12/22/94 snap. > > from freebsd -> freebsd i see 200 kbytes/second. Linux on similar boxes, > same cards, sees 980 according to a friend. > > Any hints to me (i don't read -questions) would be welcome. > (besides "convert to linux" i mean) > > > Ron Minnich |We can think of C++ as the Full Employment Act > rminnich@earth.sarnoff.com |for Programmers. After all, with each compiler > (609)-734-3120 |version change, you have to rewrite all your code. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502100401.GAA16155>