Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 10:43:10 -0700 From: Steve Passe <fbsd@clem.systemsix.com> To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Message-ID: <199503301743.KAA20983@clem.systemsix.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 1995 10:45:15 %2B0100." <199503300945.KAA23847@isl.cf.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > Actually, that's not this issue. There will certainly be a hhtpd on the > cdrom and in the ports tree, maybe even a selection. > > The issue is whether our documentation should require a httpd to be > running in order to read them properly. ok, i buy that. i guess my response would be that one should not be NECESSARY to 'read' basic documentation, but that we should not restrict ourselves from using any creative httpd-requiring ideas in the overall scheme of things. if we do develop useful 'documentation' methods whose access style suggests an httpd, i believe we should try it and include an httpd(s) with the 'advanced' documentation package (ie, things other than basic share/man/* pages). Steve Passe smp@clem.systemsix.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503301743.KAA20983>