Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 17:31:57 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=), jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: top(1) Message-ID: <199505231531.RAA11998@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <199505221903.VAA24042@grumble.grondar.za> References: <199505221903.VAA24042@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray writes: >> * > Why is top not in /usr/bin? >> >> * Because it's in /usr/local/bin? :-) >> >> And in case you want to ask "why is it in /usr/local/bin?", it's our >> policy to install ports stuff in /usr/local/* for non-X stuff and >> /usr/X11R6/* for X stuff (by default). > >I suspect that this person is actually asking "Why is top not part of the >standard distribution?". Exactly. >If this is the question, I would answer "systat", although that is not >as concise or understandable as top for a newbie. I prefer top. Systat swap does not work. Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505231531.RAA11998>