Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 00:05:08 +1000 (EST) From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: iij-ppp route problem ? Message-ID: <199506071405.AAA09999@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I was "playing with" the user-process ppp with a view to implementing a demand-dial set up here and I fell over this .. ppp ON asstdc> show route default 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UG (1) 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 ffffffff UH (3) 128.95.1.4 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 128.95.44.29 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) [ .. lots of routes that "netstat -r" doesn't show .. ] 198.41.0.5 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.12.127.0 202.14.234.69 00000000 UG (1) 202.12.127.65 202.14.234.69 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.12.127.67 202.14.234.69 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.14.234.49 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 202.14.234.64 6.0.0.0 00000000 U (1) 202.14.234.65 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (3) 202.14.234.68 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (1) 202.14.234.69 6.0.6.0 ffffffff UH (1) 202.14.234.79 6.0.0.0 ffffffff UH (1) 203.2.75.2 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 204.157.227.56 202.14.234.68 ffffffff UGH (1) 224.0.0.0 6.0.0.0 00000000 U (1) .. huh ? .. 6.0.6.0 and 6.0.0.0 ? So, two questions .. why strange numbers and why does "netstat -r" not show these routes ?, michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506071405.AAA09999>