Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 21:22:34 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, ache@astral.msk.su, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2). Message-ID: <199506261922.VAA14460@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Which I would be STRONGLY opposed to having in the source tree. > > > Why? You have voiced an opinion for another package (I cannot remember its > > name). Lets hear some argument for this. I would like _something_. > > 1. RSAREF is free for personal or corporate use under the > following conditions: > > o RSAREF, RSAREF applications, and services based on > RSAREF applications may not be sold. Does selling a `free' operating system for the distribution costs on CDROM count as `selling'? Is FreeBSD (as opposed to the CDROM) actually `sold'? (This question could easily sink to semantics, I know. Lets try to keep it sane. GNU may not be sold either. We have GNU. (Not much, and the license makes it a bit funny, but when you need it, you need it). > o You must give RSA the source code of any free RSAREF > application you plan to distribute or deploy within > your company. RSA will make these applications > available to the public, free of charge. What is the problem here? We _want_ to do this. We are going to do it anyway. > 4. You must use the interface described in the RSAREF > documentation. For European users, this does not kill RSAEURO. It is the same interface. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506261922.VAA14460>