Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Aug 1995 22:20:58 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 16-bit pids? (was Re: 16, 32, and 64bit types?)
Message-ID:  <199508312021.WAA27457@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950831154200.15535U-100000@aries> from "Brian Tao" at Aug 31, 95 03:43:14 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Brian Tao wrote:
> 
> > In the past I've been involved in some projects where pid collisions
> > due to pid wrap was a problem.
> 
>     Oh hmmmm, wow... doesn't FreeBSD have a global process limit of
> some sort?  I know I've seen "No more processes" on BSD/OS and SunOS
> systems, even though the user maxproc limit had not been reached.

That's not the problem.  The actual problem are long-living processes
that cause collisions since you expect temp files like
/foo/bar/file.<pid> to be unique within the system.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508312021.WAA27457>