Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1995 22:27:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: jkh@freefall.freebsd.org (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whither wait_t? Message-ID: <199509240527.WAA04774@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199509232157.OAA03165@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 23, 95 02:57:41 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hmm looking at osf/1
(the closet thing to posix I've ever seen......)
#ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE
/*
* If the user defines _BSD, they are obviously not looking for
* POSIX definitions with respect to wait, so give 'em the BSD
* interface.
*
*/
#ifndef _KERNEL
#ifndef _BSD /* POSIX definition of wait() */
#ifdef _NO_PROTO
extern pid_t wait();
#else
extern pid_t wait(int *);
#endif /* _NO_PROTO */
#endif /* _BSD */
.....
#endif /*_POSIX_SOURCE*/
and further down
/*
* Use of this union is deprecated
*/
union wait
{
but no definition of wait_t
>
> Shouldn't it be defined in sys/wait.h? Not in 2.1! :-(
>
> What's our evil friend POSIX say?
I don't think POSIX has ever heard of wait_t
(BTW what IS it?. it's not in 2.0.5 either..)
>
> Jordan
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509240527.WAA04774>