Date: Thu, 05 Oct 1995 23:38:42 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interactive ports Message-ID: <199510052238.XAA16191@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 1995 01:18:11 MST." <199510050818.BAA00760@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> How many of these ports are suitable for packaging? This is the list > of ports with IS_INTERACTIVE set and NO_PACKAGE not set. ... > comms/hylafax/ I guess that list came from a simple grep ! comms/hylafax/Makefile actually reads: > .if !exists(patches/patch-ab) > IS_INTERACTIVE= yes > # patches/patch-ab makes this BATCH compilable, > # ( If you need interactive config, rm patch-ab ) > .endif Hylafax is batch compilable by default (I made it so long ago ) You can ship a binary too, no worries. So rm hylafax from your list of IS_INTERACTIVE worries. Julian S
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510052238.XAA16191>