Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 13:21:24 +1000 (EST) From: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> To: ache@astral.msk.su (=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm dumps core Message-ID: <199510190321.NAA14906@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <vmAvRXmOi2@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 19, 95 05:56:10 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>In message <199510190237.MAA14718@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> David
> Dawes writes:
>
>>>In message <199510180847.SAA12056@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au> David
>>> Dawes writes:
>>>
>>>>Does this mean that the default locale names have been changed in -current
>>>>to include these underscores? On 2.0.5, they don't have them. If I do:
>>>
>>>Yes, locale names in current and stable conforms RFC 1700 (valid charset
>>>names list registered by IANA).
>>>ISO8859-1 is _invalid_ name.
>
>>I just checked a machine I have running a recent SNAP (951005), and it still
>>uses the old names. Has this been changed in stable since then?
>
>It seems that you still have obsoleted names from previous versions.
>You need to say "make distrib-dirs" in /usr/src/etc, remove
>obsoleted dirs and re-build/install /usr/src/bin/{mklocale,colldef} and
>/usr/src/share/timedef.
I'm using to a clean install of the 2.1.0-951005-SNAP binary set, not
one I built myself. It has only the old names, and not the new names.
Is that SNAP incorrect in this regard? What will be in the 2.1.0 release?
David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510190321.NAA14906>