Date: Sun, 24 Dec 1995 08:40:00 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org (user alias) Subject: A Good OS for BIND? (fwd) Message-ID: <199512240740.IAA07566@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Picked this message up from the bind list. Any takers to answer this? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de Forwarded message: > From bind-users-request@vix.com Sat Dec 23 15:44:15 1995 > X-Btw: vix.com is also gw.home.vix.com and vixie.sf.ca.us > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 95 14:11:57 CST > From: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins) > Message-Id: <9512222011.AA24236@pegasus.ncts.navy.mil> > To: bind-users@vix.com > Subject: A Good OS for BIND? > Sender: <bind-users-request@vix.com> > Precedence: bulk > Reply-To: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins) > > With the SunOS 4.1.X limitations (file descriptors and VM system) > would one of the BSD 4.4 OS's (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/OS) be a better > choice for running BIND? What other OS's would be a good choice? > > Mike >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512240740.IAA07566>