Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 13:44:15 +0100 (MET) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: malloc upgrade. Message-ID: <199603061244.NAA08274@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199603052355.KAA20299@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Mar 6, 96 10:24:57 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Luigi Rizzo stands accused of saying: > > > > I have seen that the malloc in the Feb.96 snap is much less hungry > > than the one up until 2.1R. In order to get the full advantages, > > is it enough to rebuild libc.so.X.Y with the new malloc code, or > > there is more ? > > Just grab malloc.c out of -current and drop it into the relevant place > and rebuild libc. I've been using it for a while now with no adverse > side effects (other than it forcing me to be tidier with my malloc usage 8) Is there any reason why libc is built (by default) with -O rather than -O2 ? Luigi ==================================================================== Luigi Rizzo Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ ====================================================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603061244.NAA08274>