Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 22:23:18 +0000 () From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, sos@FreeBSD.org, coredump@nervosa.com, mmead@Glock.COM, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -current and accelx Message-ID: <199603152223.WAA05025@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199603160228.TAA14695@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Mar 15, 96 07:28:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In any case, you are not misinterpreting MAP_SHARED, IMO. > It has been difficult to figure out what to do about this... What should we do about MAP_SHARED mappings in the case of fork()? Note that MAP_PRIVATE mappings are inherited (shared libs for example.) John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603152223.WAA05025>