Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 19:02:03 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do folks think of the following patch? Message-ID: <199604220102.TAA07674@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199604212353.QAA06576@time.cdrom.com> References: <199604212353.QAA06576@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It seems like world, update, all and install should be targets which > include an optional sub-make in /etc/Makefile for the corresponding > target (only the diff to world: is shown here). This would give us > a nice way of doing site-specific stuff which is preserved across changes > to /usr/src/Makefile. Since both /etc/make.conf and /usr/src/Makefile are generated by us, what does adding it in the tree vs. having them add buy us? In either case, the end-user has to edit the files. (I'm not against the idea, but I don't see any purpose for it.) nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604220102.TAA07674>