Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 15:56:28 +0200 (SAT) From: Robert Nordier <rnordier@iafrica.com> To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIX System Message-ID: <199605121356.PAA07602@eac.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: <199605120922.LAA29502@allegro.lemis.de> from "Greg Lehey" at May 12, 96 11:22:21 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> Hugh D. McVicker writes:
> >
> > Is Freebsd a UNIX operating system for PCs?
>
> Yes and no. FreeBSD is derived from UNIX, but as of a couple of years
> ago, the term "UNIX" is a trade mark, not a description of an
> operating system. As a result, FreeBSD many not be called UNIX. I'm
> still wondering, however, whether it may not be called "Berkeley
> UNIX".
Does 'Unix as trademark' really date back only a couple of years?
I have a series of P.J. Plauger articles (Computer Language, 1988-9)
in which he discusses protecting intellectual property. He writes:
If you play fast and loose with the UNIX name in any of your
ads, you will get a letter from AT&T. The letter will remind
you that UNIX is a proprietary etc., etc., and suggest ways
you should refer to it in the future so as not to introduce
the least element of uncertainty in the minds of readers of
your ads.... They have a copy of the letter in their files
to prove they are assiduously defending their trademark.
Since Bill's articles were the only reason I ever bought 'Computer
Language' (after the defection of Stan Kelly-Bootle) anyway, I'd
hate to think he's been misleading me all this time. 8)
--
Robert Nordier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605121356.PAA07602>