Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 08:34:57 -0400 From: "Jacob M. Parnas" <jparnas@jparnas.cybercom.net> To: Bob Loftus <bobster@primenet.com> Cc: "Aaron D. Gifford" <agifford@infowest.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bsdi-users@bsdi.com Subject: Re: Adaptec2940UW vs. BusLogicBT-958 (opinions?) Message-ID: <199606121235.IAA12473@jparnas.cybercom.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:35:39 PDT. <Pine.BSD.3.91.960611162414.19152A-100000@usr06.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSD.3.91.960611162414.19152A-100000@usr06.primenet.com>you write: >I believe that Paul Vixie has expounded quite masterfully on this topic >in the past, check the bsdi-users archive @ nexial.nl as I recall it >doesn't really matter, and you can't possibly keep the scsi bus busy >enough to warrant it. "Wide SCSI is just for those suffering from >spec-envy." "Wide SCSI has lovely marketing, I guess. Everybody wants it, >nobody needs it." -- Paul Vixie >Have fun... Would you please elaborate a bit on the logic? I don't see why with up to 15 devices, you couldn't fill up 40MB/sec for a fast/wide/ultra SCSI III bus? Especially with some raids counting as one large SCSI device? Trying to understand, Jacob
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606121235.IAA12473>