Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 23:43:55 -0500 (CDT) From: mikebo@tellabs.com To: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu (Bill Paul) Cc: mikebo (Mike Borowiec), bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1-960627-SNAP: YP problem Message-ID: <199607090443.XAA21244@sunc210.tellabs.com> In-Reply-To: <199607090430.AAA18230@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> from "Bill Paul" at Jul 9, 96 00:30:28 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill - You wrote: > Uh, I'm Bill, not Gary. :) > Sorry... I told ya I was tired! ;v) > > > marple# ls -l /usr/lib/libc.* > > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 497710 Jun 28 04:44 /usr/lib/libc.a > > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 435727 Jun 28 04:44 /usr/lib/libc.so.2.2 > > Notice also that the timestamps on both my libraries match. In > your case, libc.so.2.2 and libc.a should match but they don't. (Your > libc.a looks correct however.) > > > toybox> ls -l /usr/lib/libc.* > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 497710 Jun 28 03:44 /usr/lib/libc.a > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 403106 Jul 3 1994 /usr/lib/libc.so.1.1 > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 466907 Jan 25 1995 /usr/lib/libc.so.2.0 > > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 435248 Apr 27 16:57 /usr/lib/libc.so.2.2 > > > I think you do have a bogus libc.so.2.2, however I can't explain how > you got it. The compat distribution is supposed to add the two older > libraries (I guess) not replace the 'standard' one. (Note that I did > do a custom install on my box: I specifically selected the bin, man, > games, dict and des distributions and nothing else. > I did a custom install also. Perhaps Jordan can shed some light here? > Anyway, here's how you can try to fix this: get the bin distribution > (bin.aa through bin.whatever) and extract the libc.so.2.2 from there. > The distribution is basically one giant tar.gz archive. You can > extract a single file from it like this: > > % cat bin.?? | gzip -d | tar -xf - usr/lib/libc.so.2.2 > > Replace your existing libc.so.2.2 with this one (this is best done > from single user mode) and then see if NIS works. Ideally, it should. > > I still can't figure out how the test program seemed to work before > though. > Yes, it still works... I don't get it. But hey, if I got a bogus libc.so then what the heck else is fouled up? Basically, I no longer trust this installation. I may blow it away... Jordan, if you want me to run anything against my system before I blow it away (in case you were curious as to how the installation gave me a bogus libc.so) just ask, but soon. ;v) - Mike -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Borowiec - mikebo@tellabs.com - Tellabs Operations Inc. Senior Member of Technical Staff 4951 Indiana Avenue, MS 63 708-512-8211 FAX: 708-512-7099 Lisle, IL 60532 USA --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607090443.XAA21244>