Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Aug 1996 20:44:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Curio
Message-ID:  <199608220044.UAA01732@crh.cl.msu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <19050.840674342@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Aug 21, 96 05:39:02 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hmmmm!  I have a P6/200 (I *refuse* to call it a Pentium Pro, I simply
> refuse! :-) and an old, wheezing 2940 myself.  Can you elaborate a little
> bit on this?  What do you mean when you say "dramatically?"
>
> I actually need an extra Adaptec anyway (I'm using a Bt946c in another
> machine and would like to kick it out) so I'll dash over to the
> computer store right now and buy one, if they've any in stock.

Well dramatically means windows seem to snap open a little faster, things pop
just a bit quicker.  The big improvement is when im running xfqcam (which is
spin-polling the parallel port), with xfqcam running access to NFS has (had) 2+
second pauses before dashing off and doing the access.  Now, snappy, certainly
as fast as without xfqcam running, and probably a tad faster.  Perhaps the old
2940 was causing lots of interupts it shouldnt have been?

In this case YMMV applies very much!

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608220044.UAA01732>