Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 13:32:16 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: imp@village.org, thorpej@nas.nasa.gov Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Quick question about getopt Message-ID: <199609290332.NAA14195@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Given the standards reference, should FreeBSD[*] change getopt to return >-1 rather than EOF? I'm inclidned to say yes. However, there are >likely reasons for not doing this. None. EOF is identical with (-1) on all supported systems, and there are no complications from EOF being defined in the wrong places. >[*] If the answer is "yes" then I'll volunteer to make the changes to >the tree that are needed. Get them from 4.4Lite2. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609290332.NAA14195>