Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 18:58:22 -0400 (AST) From: "J.M. Chuang" <smp@bluenose.na.tuns.ca> To: erich@lodgenet.com (Eric L. Hernes) Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status report... Message-ID: <199612022258.SAA10867@bluenose.na.tuns.ca> In-Reply-To: <199612021949.NAA04298@jake.lodgenet.com> from "Eric L. Hernes" at "Dec 2, 96 01:49:28 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I just tested a kernel from this morning (12/1). It is *much* better > than the one I tried last week. Last week I got lots of sig11's, but > I haven't seen one yet! But I am getting a few silo overflows > from the mouse, dmesg shows: > I got the same thing. No sig11's. But when I run multiple processes, it seems that all the processes are taken care of by the same cpu and switched back and forth. On the screen of `top': RUN/#1 cpp CPU/#1 top .... RUN/#0 cpp RUN/#0 top Is the schedule supposed like that? I remember before the merge with the current, the multiple processes were RUN/#1 cpp CPU/#0 top .... Besides, if the system is rebooted, I always got the message like: I'm on cpu #1, I need to be on cpu #0! Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612022258.SAA10867>