Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 16:24:36 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: imp@village.org Cc: m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ache@nagual.ru, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <199701090024.QAA02525@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <E0vi2Wj-00031q-00@rover.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Wed, 08 Jan 1997 11:15:01 -0700)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Letting the OpenBSD sort it out strikes me as a bad way to do this. * It sends the wrong message to the OpenBSD camp that they are not * important or worth consideration in the changes to the ports tree. * While this specific change may be better, framing the change in such * terms only exacerbates already tense relations between the two camps. * Just my view of the situation, not the opinion of any camps that I may * have my feet in... On the contrary, Warner, on the contrary. This is a lot of work to do, and by doing this, we are going to send a clear message that OpenBSD is welcome to share the ports tree with us. As long as we don't change clearly FreeBSD-centric things to use BSD, I would think most of the ports tree will be happily compilable on OpenBSD too. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701090024.QAA02525>