Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 13:52:50 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: G++ calling conventions Message-ID: <199702152052.NAA03985@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have an application which aggregates a number of COM objects
into a single implementation object for a set of interfaces
(a set of pointers to code providing implementation for pure
virtual base classes).
Does anyone know if gcc and/or g++ support the __stdcall type
designator?
The __stdcall allows you to mark functions as callee-pop on a
per function basis (and __cdecl allows you to mark functions
caller-pop on a per function basis).
For instance:
struct ImyInterface {
virtual void __stdcall function1() = 0;
};
class CmyInterface : ImyInterface {
public:
CmyInterface();
~CmyInterface();
virtual void __stdcall function1( void) = 0;
};
...
// this function is callee-pop, and will pop its arguments off the
// stack before returning...
void __stdcall
CmyInterface::function1( void)
{
...
}
...sort of like a generic "-mrtd" that doesn't need an rtd instruction?
(Clearly, varradic functions must be __cdecl).
???
PS: What would be the chances of supporting the "interface" keyword
as an alias for "struct" in a future release? This can be done
in a FreeBSD-specific way using the g++ config data files (I think).
Regards,
Terry Lambert
terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702152052.NAA03985>