Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 12:48:37 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, j@ida.interface-business.de Subject: Re: ep0 in GENERIC Message-ID: <199702180148.MAA20191@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Why don't we use the following config line for ep0 (3C509)? > >device ep0 at isa? port ? net irq ? vector epintr Because the probe doesn't honour conflicts and is invasive. >The autoprobing seems to work, and it's as invasive as not using >autoprobing since it happens by reading the EEPROM via a fixed port >address (which is done anyway as long as at least one ep device is No, the autoprobing isn't done if a previous driver finds something at 0x300, because the ep0 address conflicts so ep0 isn't probed. The probes are done in non-alphabetical order to increase the chance of avoiding invasive probes like ep0's. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702180148.MAA20191>