Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 00:20:16 +0100 (MET) From: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: obrien@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h Message-ID: <199702222320.AAA09172@ocean.campus.luth.se> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970222201055.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Feb 22, 97 08:10:55 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to J Wunsch: > As David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > obrien 97/02/16 12:55:34 > > > > Modified: contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h > > Log: > > Add _BSD4_4 as a predefined symbol. > > Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) suggested this is the most approate symbol > > to use. > > > > 2.2-R candidate. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.2 +1 -1 src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd-elf.h > > 1.4 +1 -1 src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd.h > > What ever came out of this discussion? 2.2 candidate, or dead end? It's not really needed. What about: ==== myprogconfig.h ==== #if defined(FreeBSD) || defined(OpenBSD) || defined(NetBSD) #define MYBSDDEF #endif ======================== There you have your single define. It's very simple to do, and it works on old versions of the OSes too. Ofcourse, I don't think it hurts to have that _BSD4_4 define either. Only thing it does is give a very minor polution to the define namespace. Just my $0.02... /Mikael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702222320.AAA09172>