Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 19:45:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: jfieber@indiana.edu (John Fieber) Cc: paul@demon.co.uk, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl5 modules Message-ID: <199702261945.TAA00656@veda.is> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970226114649.25055Q-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> from John Fieber at "Feb 26, 97 11:48:44 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why not simply bundle them all together in ports/pl/ and of course strip p5- > > from the names. (ports/p5/ if preferred) > > Need the name be so obtuse? We may as well waste an extra couple > bytes and call it "perl" instead of "p". > > -john > Exactly my first thoughts on the subject, but then some might push to move the perl port itself into there, which would be wrong. perl is a fine choice, so long as people understand that it is intended only for perl5 scripts. Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702261945.TAA00656>