Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 18:24:08 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Dabrowski <chris@vader.org> To: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Cc: chris@vader.org, committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current unassigned ports problem reports Message-ID: <199704151724.SAA01828@tatooine.vader.org> In-Reply-To: <199704151622.AAA02950@spinner.DIALix.COM> from Peter Wemm at "Apr 16, 97 00:22:27 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In a previous message, Peter Wemm wrote: > Chris Dabrowski wrote: > > In a previous message, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote: > > > > > o [1997/02/20] ports/2778 ports New Port: Version of traceroute which pr > > > > Any chance of getting this port committed? It's a version of traceroute that > > shows AS (network) number of each hop. Pretty useful for ISPs to debug > > gated/routing type problems: > > Perhaps we should we update the src/contrib/traceroute to this version? > This one appears to do lots of things the current version doesn't, > including mtu discovery etc. Even better. :-) If everyone agrees to this, then I can convert it from a 'port' to a 'contrib'. I just have a couple of questions on how to do this: Do I commit against my local CVS repository and then mail the diffs to somebody? The version of traceroute in 'contrib' already has a vendor branch. Can CVS handle two independent verdor branches or do I set up a new directory? Cheers, Chris -- Chris Dabrowski chris@vader.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704151724.SAA01828>