Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Apr 1997 19:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:      asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
To:        atr@pobox.com
Cc:        michaelv@MindBender.serv.net, tom@inna.net, drussell@saturn-tech.com, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, steve@visint.co.uk, dave@persprog.com, hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ?
Message-ID:  <199704170213.TAA19390@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970416121159.2259A-100000@gonzo.wolfenet.com> (aroberts@WOLFENET.com)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * I'm asking folks to let me know what benchmarks people want to see.. If
 * there is no interest I'll probably just run the usual stuff for my own
 * benefit. However if some folks are evaluating a purchase and have some
 * specific benchmarks they want to see.. send 'em my way... no promises but
 * I'll do my best.

I want to see this:

  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1m count=200

:)

Results so far:

 P5-133 115MB/s (non-parity EDO, with P5-optimized copyin/out)
 P6-200  89MB/s (non-parity EDO)
 P6-200  87MB/s (with ECC, non-EDO)
 P6-233  89MB/s (with ECC, non-EDO)

All with 60ns memory.  P5-133 is Triton I (430FX), P6 are Natomas (440FX).

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704170213.TAA19390>