Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 11:35:31 -0500 From: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...) Message-ID: <199704301635.LAA23173@nyx.pr.mcs.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 30 Apr 1997 08:19:12 %2B0100. <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970430081033.13137F-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The important point is that there is *no difference* between the dynamic >and statically loaded version of a driver. I can go into a >/sys/compile/FOO directory and construct loadable modules from the same >object files. How about a statically loaded version of the kernel? I mean, will it now be nothing more than an aggregate of some modules? It would be nice if all there were were modules, and to make yourself a kernel, you just had to stick them together.. --Chris Csanady >-- >Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com >Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891 >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704301635.LAA23173>