Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 May 1997 00:34:40 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions
Message-ID:  <19970524003440.QC44104@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970523141109.ian@ian.broken.net>; from Ian Struble on May 23, 1997 14:08:23 -0700
References:  <19970523224300.LX25394@uriah.heep.sax.de> <XFMail.970523141109.ian@ian.broken.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Ian Struble wrote:

> >I would prefer mickeysoft using RR. :-]
> 
> Me too.  I was just reading about Joliet and wondering why they didn't.  I
> guess it is just the usual 'not invented here syndrome'... 

Also my guess.  Or simply ignorance: ``Oh, there is already a standard
for long filenames?  But how could this be, since they have only been
introduced into the world by Windows[TM] NT and Windows[TM] 95.''

TM == trashmark, of course.
-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970524003440.QC44104>