Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 17:49:18 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: page fault Message-ID: <19970604174918.CS56609@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199706030730.KAA09291@shadows.aeon.net>; from mika ruohotie on Jun 3, 1997 10:30:19 %2B0300 References: <19970602220739.KN28267@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199706030730.KAA09291@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As mika ruohotie wrote: > > I hope, after reading that stuff, you know what i mean by the above > > comment. > > yes, but i failed to get kernel -g:ed. i guess after this i'll use > the 'config -g' as default. Be careful to not accidentally load this bloated kernel into memory. :) Also, i found the time ld(1) requires to link a full -g kernel to be enormous. Normally, if i just wanna examine a core dump, i modify the Makefile to use the same cc options as before (notably the same optimization level), but add -g. NB: you gotta replace the COPTS ?= line by an absolute one. Then, i remove the .o files i wanna force to rebuild, and just rebuild this part of the kernel. After this, you can usually analyze the stacktrace. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970604174918.CS56609>