Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Aug 1997 20:52:19 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De>
To:        brandon@roguetrader.com (Brandon Gillespie)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: why bother submitting anything (via send-pr)
Message-ID:  <199708101852.UAA27642@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970810104350.2884A-100000@roguetrader.com> from Brandon Gillespie at "Aug 10, 97 10:50:27 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm debating with myself why I should bother submitting anything with
> send-pr anymore.  It seems that unless it happens to be a pet project of
> one of the developers, it will pretty much be ignored and never committed. 
> I have two submissions pending SOME response (even a 'no, we dont want it'
> would be appreciated)--but nothing.  The first is a rewrite of the
> libcrypt, and the second is 'doconfig' (a wrap of the kernel build
> process, based off Digital Unix'es doconfig). Its been so long since I've
> sent these in that I've lost the send-pr id for them (altho I could dig
> them up again). 

The cryp() stuff is misc/2302 (1996/12/27) and the config wrapper
is bin/3386 (1997/04/25).

misc/2302 was analyzed by Mark Murray and he wrote on Jan 18 that he
is going to "commit it real soon now".

bin/3386 was "Responsible Changed" from gnats-admin-&gt to FreeBSD-bugs
by Satoshi on May 20.

That is all that happened to those two PRs till today.

The PRs seem to be orphaned since Mike Pritchard left the FreeBSD
project in May 1997.  We submitters who are not committers have a
*very* hard time getting any feedback.

Six of my submissions are left open. Some of them are already fixed or 
analyzed and should be closed, some are only fixing typos or adding
a line to man pages and are not worth the trouble you have to
go into in order to get your submission noticed. 

> Basically, what i'm wondering (as a disgruntled person wanting to help but
> seeming to be ignored) is why isn't there somebody simply responsible for

You are not the only one wondering!

> non-developer submissions?  So far it seems that the way things work
> around here is if a developer takes interest in it, it'll move forward,
> otherwise too bad, mebbe one of the other *BSD systems will like it. 

They do! Last week I've got more responses (three) from NetBSD users
than from the FreeBSD project (zero).

> Now, to retract a touch, I was in contact with Mark Murray
> (mark@grondar.za) about the libcrypt rewrite--but I think he had some
> hardware problems and either lost interest or isn't able to do much at the
> moment (I havn't had any responses back from him).

Jordan mentioned that he's going to hire developers for porting
the OS to another architecture. (He left open which architecture.)
I conclude from this, the desertion of the PRs and the discussion
about current ports versus stable ports that the FreeBSD project
is switching to a commercial company that does not depend on
volunteers any more in the long run.

Wolfgang



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708101852.UAA27642>