Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:58:55 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, mobile@freebsd.org, handy@sag.space.lockheed.com Subject: Re: Patches from -current for -stable I'd like to commit after testing Message-ID: <199710220428.NAA01198@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 1997 22:18:50 CST." <199710220418.WAA08580@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > (One killer is that the code now allocates IRQ 11 by default for the > > pcic, but IRQ 11 is used by "something" else that's not probed. > > I changed the code to use the 'highest' un-allocated IRQ, because that's > what Win95 does and many machines used built-in IRQ's for IRQ 3. Understood entirely; all I meant was that you moved the problem from your machine to mine. 8) > > There > > needs to be a mechanism for explicitly specifying an IRQ for the pcic.) > > Yes, there does. But, because of the current 'ISA' leanings of the > configuration, there isn't an easy way. I hacked an option into kern_intr that allows you to specify a mask of interrupts that can never be allowed on the system; this seemed to work pretty well. > In the meantime, you could try backing out the change I made to see if > things start working again. I did that; it didn't help. I need to spend some more time chasing kernel builds; I just don't have that right now. (Assignments, exams, new product lagging on a solid deadline...) mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710220428.NAA01198>